Drawing for MONOFLEX

USPTO serial 79015915

MONOFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONOFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Safety systems for vehicles for locomotion by land, water, air and space, namely passenger restraint systems, especially airbags, airbelts, safety belts, as parts of vehicles, parts of the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
022Textile belts and straps, including belts made of natural or synthetic fibers, threads or fabrics, all for handling loadsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
024Woven fabrics and textile material, included in this class, especially textile goods, woven, knitted or braided fabrics, as well as tubular braided textile material, laminated or coated textile materialSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 11, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 5, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 15, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Oct 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance