Drawing for GRANITOGRES

USPTO serial 79016011

GRANITOGRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCROBBIE, JENNIFER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANITOGRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Iris Hess,

LADAS & PARRY LLP5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Ceramic tiles for walls and floorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 11, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 6, 2007RRGMREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT - DISMISSED
Sep 5, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jun 13, 2007RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2006DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance