USPTO serial 79016042
ELIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, molluscs and crustaceans (not live); poultry, game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables, dry and cooked, jellies, jams, eggs, milk dairy products including milk beverages, evaporated and dry milk powder, edible oils and fats, preserved foodstuffs included in this class, macerated vegetables in vinegar | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |