Drawing for Serial No. 79016072

USPTO serial 79016072

Serial No. 79016072

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79016072?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Banner

BRIAN E BANNER ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pastries and confectionery, namely, cookies, snacks and cakes; chocolate products,namely, chocolates, chocolate candies, cocoa and cocoa mixes and paste for drinks,chocolate pastes and coverings, chocolate eggs, decorations for Christmas trees made of chocolate, chocolate bars made of an edible chocolate case with an alcohol filling;flavored icesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 7, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance