USPTO serial 79016116
COMTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3576286Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FR
FR
F-92526 Neuilly Sur Seine Cedex, FR
F-92526 Neuilly Sur Seine Cedex, FR
F-92526 Neuilly Sur Seine Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
K. BRADFORD ADOLPHSON
K. Bradford Adolphson Ware, Fressola, Van Der Sluys & Adolphso755 Main Street, P.O. Box 224Bradford Green, Bldg., FiveMonroe, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus, equipment and devices for video surveillance, alarms and warning signals for use in railway transport, namely, computer hardware and software for use in video surveillance of rail traffic and control and operation of alarm and warning signals for rail traffic, video cameras, video monitors, wireless transmitters and receivers, antennas, on-board electrical controllers, way-side electrical controllers, access control and monitoring systems comprised of computer hardware; apparatus, equipment and devices for communication and signaling by means of radio, light, mechanically, electrically, electronically, electromechanically or acoustically to give information to rail transport users and operate a railway network, namely, computer hardware and software for monitoring railway traffic, Light-Emitting Diode, electromechanical video monitors and video monitors, electronic and electromechanical notice and indicator boards, inductive data transmission systems comprised of data processors and computer hardware, railway signals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL LUCENT
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL Société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks owned by THALES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COMTRAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |