USPTO serial 79016149
TRACERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEYER, ELIZABETH L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRACERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, computer software, software packages, recorded or blank data media in the form of tapes, disks, diskettes or cards, all these goods for quality control, inspection of merchandise, customs valuation, merchandise classification, risk analysis, warehouse management and inventory control, tracing of merchandise, of containers and means of transport | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical inspection of vehicles; inspection of ships and aircraft; quality control, namely inspection of merchandise, raw materials, manufactured, semi-manufactured, transformed goods or goods of all types; merchandise origin control; merchandise quality, quantity and authenticity control; inspection before embarkation with a view to issuing a certificate of conformity; inspection of merchandise, equipment, services and systems for ensuring conformity to standards, especially national and international environmental standards, laws, regulations, practices and standards, to clients' contractual requirements as well as to other national and international normative documents relating to goods, services, personnel management systems and management systems, resulting in the issuance of a certificate of conformity; technical audits in the field of science and technology; setting up safety chain systems, namely systems for analyzing and checking all the stages involved in the process of manufacturing and distribution of the goods created by a company; inspection of apparatus; quality control for buildings; inspection of plant and machinery; analysis and testing services for oil fields and oil works; testing and supervision of oil plants; industrial testing; material testing; product testing; product quality and safety testing; visual examination of merchandise; weighing and measuring of bulk goods; development, design and creation of software, updating, modification and maintenance of software; advice regarding computer science, computer programming, consultancy relating to computer science and computers, remote updating and maintenance of computer software, rental of computer software; hosting of computer sites; technology transfer, evaluation of conformity to labor standards (private standards, international conventions, public legislation) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |