Drawing for ASTHMAPHARMA

USPTO serial 79016184

ASTHMAPHARMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTHMAPHARMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HORST M KASPER

13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for asthma and allergy disordersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 23, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance