Drawing for WOODPRO

USPTO serial 79016324

WOODPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOODPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 8, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 5, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance