USPTO serial 79016342
RESIBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3239975Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESIBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas M. McAllister, Barry R. Lipsitz
DOUGLAS M MCALLISTER, BARRY R LIPSITZ LIPSITZ & MCALLISTER LLCBLDG 8755 MAIN STMONROE, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | metalworking machine tools; machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; computerized production machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; packing machines; machines for manufacturing and dispensing packing materials; machines for manufacturing containers made of synthetic materials; machines for manufacturing containers of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic materials through the application of a barrier technique against carbon dioxide and dioxide; extrusion moulding machines for manufacturing containers of plastic materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Semi-finished synthetic plastic in the form of foils, plates, rods, profiles, hoses, tubes, blocks and granulates; semi-finished synthetic plastic in the form of foils, plates, rods, profiles, hoses, tubes, blocks and granulates for use in the manufacture of plastic containers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | bottles, sold empty; portable plastic containers for storing household goods, kitchen goods, foods, drinks, and cosmetics, namely, bottles, pots, tankards, tubes and cans made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) material | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RESILUX N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by RESILUX N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by RESILUX N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RESIBAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |