USPTO serial 79016383
REMISE EN FORME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3405603Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2008
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REMISE EN FORME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |