Drawing for PROGRAMME BALNÉO

USPTO serial 79016384

PROGRAMME BALNÉO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRAMME BALNÉO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 7, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance