Drawing for EX-TEC

USPTO serial 79016393

EX-TEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3196975Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EX-TEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Laubscher, Sr.

Lawrence E. Laubscher, Sr. Laubscher Spendlove & Laubscher, P.C.1160 Spa RoadSuite 2BAnnapolis, MD 21503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, electronic and electromagnetic measuring and detecting apparatus for operating and monitoring fluid supply and drainage systems, namely, the localization of tubes, pipes, cables and metals, the detection of leaks, the measurement of noise, flow rates, temperature, gas concentration and other fluid parameters; electronic warning apparatus for fluid installations comprising the aboveACTIVE
037[Building pipe systems for liquids and gases, also for oil pipelines]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042[Technical consulting and services provided by an engineer on sites for building pipe systems and carrying out leakage tests; drawing up of plans of piping networks for third parties; detection of water and gas leaks underground, in buildings and on ships]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 7, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 25, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 25, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 16, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 16, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 16, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 14, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Aug 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 15, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 28, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 28, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Aug 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 15, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Nov 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Jun 15, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance