Drawing for ITP

USPTO serial 79016419

ITP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic materials in sheets for packaging; paper; paper goods; plastic film coupled for packaging; film of plastic materials; co-extruded plastic films of polyolefine resines weldable by lamination for packaging, namely for packaging of foodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
017Extruded and co-extruded plastic films; semi-manufactured products in plastic materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance