Drawing for HEAVEN

USPTO serial 79016463

HEAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter L. Michaelson

Peter L. Michaelson Michaelson & AssociatesP.O. Box 8489Red Bank, NJ 07701-8489UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Articles of clothing; articles of sport clothing; articles of outer-clothingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Nightclub entertainment services; promotion and performance of live entertainment by various artistes; provision of music entertainment; organization and production of stage shows, competitions, contests, dance and themed parties; publishing services; video and audio tape production; production of radio and television programmes; production of shows; arranging and providing facilities for exhibitions and conferences; photography servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Club, hotel and public house servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 15, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance