USPTO serial 79016531
POHRIS FIBER GMBH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POHRIS FIBER GMBH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher, Attorney
RALPH E LOCHER, ATTORNEY LERNER GREENBERG STEMER LLPPO BOX 2480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Brake lining materials semi-processed; fiberglass for insulation in buildings; insulating felt for use in the construction industry; insulating fabrics, namely chopped glass, glass mats, glass yarn, glass weave, glass fabric tapes, glass non-woven, glass noses, glass cords, and glass twists for use in building construction; fiberglass fabrics for building insulation, fiberglass building insulation; glass wool for building insulation; glass fiber electrical insulating tape and band; reinforcing materials not of metal for pipes, namely un-worked or semi-worked glass band, glass tapes, glass fabric tapes, glass non-woven, glass noses, chopped glass, glass mats, glass yarn, and glass weave; mineral wool for use in the manufacture of filter media; and mineral wool for use as a building insulator | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Reinforcing materials, not of metal for building, namely un-worked or semi-worked glass inlays, chopped glass, and glass mats; building materials , not of metal, namely glass fabrics, glass non-woven, glass inlays, chopped glass, and glass mats; asphalted felt for building purposes; and geo-textiles, namely fabrics and sheeting for nurseries, greenhouses and landscaping | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Glass threads for nontextile purposes; fiberglass not for insulation or textile use, namely glass roving and glass yarn; and glass wool not for insulation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Wrapping or binding bands, not of metal; glass fibers for textile use; mineral fiber, namely, hemp fibers, glass fabric tapes, glass yarn, and glass roving; fibers for textile ;use; thread, not of metal, for wrapping or binding; twine for nets; and ropes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | Fiberglass thread for textile use; yarn for textile use; spun thread and yarn; glass yarn and glass roving | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Felt cloth; gauze fabric; fabrics for textile use, namely fabrics used in the manufacture of glass non-woven, glass inlays, glass mats, glass fabric weave, and glass yarn; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; glass silk fabrics; wall hanging of textile; non-woven textile fabrics; and elastic woven fabrics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings, namely glass fabric waves and glass inlays | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.D.R. Biotec Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named POHRIS FIBER GMBH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |