Drawing for PENTACAM

USPTO serial 79016552

PENTACAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223229Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PENTACAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter B. Bromaghim

Peter B. Bromaghim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP400 Spectrum Center DriveSuite 1700Irvine, CA 92618

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ophthalmologic apparatus and instruments for scientific use, namely, electronic eye scanners, computer hardware and operating software for use therewith for ophthalmologic applications; photographic apparatus, namely, cameras; magnifying glasses and lenses; magnets and magnetic instruments, namely, magnetometers, cardiometric apparatus, namely, ophthalmic microscopes; electro magnets; frames and lenses for spectacles; measuring glasses; colorimeters; optical prisms; optical filters; contact lenses; computer peripheral devices; blank magnetic, magneto-optical and optical data media data carries; microscopes; refractometers * all the aforesaid goods only for ophthalmological apparatus and instruments *ACTIVE—
010Ophthalmological apparatus and instruments for medical use, namely, ophthalmoscopes and ophthalmometers; medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely, Scheimpflug cameras; surgical instruments for treating eye diseases, eye disorders, and eye defects; optometric instruments, namely, instruments for measuring the diameter of ophthalmic lenses; optometric instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; electronic medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely, topography apparatus for measuring the cornea; medical lasers, namely, YAG, diode and excimer lasersACTIVE—
042Scientific research; technological research services in the field of ophthalmic diagnostics and design relating thereto, namely, diagnostic product design; industrial analysis and research services in the field of ophthalmic diagnostics; design and development of computer hardware and software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 21, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 12, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 25, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 19, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 19, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 27, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2008LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance