Drawing for LAUTERSTAR

USPTO serial 79016707

LAUTERSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3127184Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2006
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LAUTERSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia A. Moyer

Cynthia A. Moyer FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.60 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ Common metals and their alloys, namely, common metals and their alloys in rod, sheet or tube form for use in further manufacture; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metal; safes of metal; goods of common metal, namely, general purpose metal storage bins; ] straining vats of metal, namely, stainless steel straining metal tubs and barrels with built-in release, stir and emptying devices and with built-in filter for the separating of liquids from solids; [ stainless steel sedimentation tubs and barrels; ] containers of metal used as vats [ or pressure tanks, also fitted with regulating mechanisms in particular for pressure, temperature or for pumps to promote the flow of the contents of the container; flake ice containers of metal, in particular with stirring devices and automatic ice release devices; storage tanks, buffer tanks and overflow tanks of metal, in particular of stainless steel ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 5, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 8, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 30, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 26, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 7, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 4, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 4, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 2, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 19, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 19, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jan 23, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 8, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 16, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 13, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 9, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance