USPTO serial 79016707
LAUTERSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3127184Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LAUTERSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia A. Moyer
Cynthia A. Moyer FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.60 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Common metals and their alloys, namely, common metals and their alloys in rod, sheet or tube form for use in further manufacture; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metal; safes of metal; goods of common metal, namely, general purpose metal storage bins; ] straining vats of metal, namely, stainless steel straining metal tubs and barrels with built-in release, stir and emptying devices and with built-in filter for the separating of liquids from solids; [ stainless steel sedimentation tubs and barrels; ] containers of metal used as vats [ or pressure tanks, also fitted with regulating mechanisms in particular for pressure, temperature or for pumps to promote the flow of the contents of the container; flake ice containers of metal, in particular with stirring devices and automatic ice release devices; storage tanks, buffer tanks and overflow tanks of metal, in particular of stainless steel ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huppmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huppmann AG
- Other trademarks owned by GEA Brewery Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huppmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huppmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GEA Liquid Technologies Germany GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named LAUTERSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |