Drawing for EDICOM

USPTO serial 79016711

EDICOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDICOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing computer and computer hardware consulting services, computer systems analysis, software design and computer programming, updating of software, renting of software and computers, rental of access time to a computer or to a computing databaseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance