USPTO serial 79016736
BWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compliance and enterprise risk management software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Rendering advice related to commercial and business management and organization | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Computer education training services; training for the use of compliance and enterprise risk management software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computerization services, namely developing computer programs for compliance and enterprise risk management; computer software design for other; consultancy on the implementation of computer software; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware and software for use in the telecommunications industry; rendering advice relating to information technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |