Drawing for ELIOS

USPTO serial 79016761

ELIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3168971Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 7, 2006
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert and Jeremy Craft

JOHN S EGBERT & JEREMY CRAFT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; fruits and vegetables preserved; jams; olive-oil; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Pasta; products consisting primarily of pasta, namely, macaroni, pasta salad; pastries; oven-cooked products consisting primarily of flour, namely, biscuits and wholemeal biscuits, and condiment saucesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 6, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance