Drawing for PICO DROPPER

USPTO serial 79016781

PICO DROPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4231840Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2012
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICO DROPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay A. Bondell

Jay A. Bondell Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific apparatus, namely, apparatus for the dispensing of solutions onto the surface of protein crystals for protein structure analysisSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Scientific research and development; technological research and development in the field of crystallography, X-ray structure determination, proteins and protein crystals; industrial analysis and research services, namely, research related to drug development, proteins, protein structures and protein crystalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jun 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 14, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 14, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Dec 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance