USPTO serial 79016968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
BEYAZIT-ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
BEYAZIT-ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ELIBOL DERI KONFEKSIYON TURIZM SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, overcoats, coats, raincoats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, jerseys, waistcoats, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, cardigans, skirts, blouses, sweaters, shorts, overalls, underwear, undershirts, underpants, panties, brassieres, corsets, dressing gowns, nightgowns, wedding dresses; working clothes, namely uniforms; school aprons; knitwear, namely pants; jeans clothing, namely jean jackets, jean pants; clothing of leather, namely leather jackets, leather pants; casual wear, namely pants; bathing suits and swimwear; beachwear; pajamas, gloves; socks; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, half-boots, rain boots, ski boots, special gymnastic shoes, sandals, slippers, lace boots and their parts, sports shoes, shoe parts, namely heelpieces, heels and footwear uppers; headwear, namely caps, hats, berets, caps, bandanas, headbands; clothing for babies, namely babies' diapers of textile, babies' bibs of textile, layettes, innerwear for babies, namely one piece garment for infants and toddlers; nylon diapers, bibs not of paper; ties, neckties, shawls, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, sarongs, collars for dresses, maniples, muffs, wristbands, belts, suspenders, braces for clothing, garters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |