Drawing for IRRESISTIBLE

USPTO serial 79016980

IRRESISTIBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3215975Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRRESISTIBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Boutell, Dale H. Thiel, Terryence F. Chapman, Mark L. Maki, Liane L. Churney, Brian R. Tumm, Steven R. Thiel, Donald J. Wallace and Sidney B. Williams, Jr.

DAVID G BOUTELL, DALE H THIEL, TERRYEN FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dosing devices, namely, dosers, dispensers, atomizers and spray pumps for medical purposes, namely, spray pumps, lotion and gel pumps, dosimeters and dispensers that count or measure output for use in nasal, oral, topical and pulmonary applications.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021Dosing devices, namely, dosers, dispensers, atomizers and spray pumps for non-medical purposes, namely, spray pump bottles sold empty, pump bottles for lotions and gels sold empty, and dispensers for the application of perfumery, powder, lotions and gels that dispense a measured output, all sold empty.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 3, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 11, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance