USPTO serial 79017142
TWIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3171730Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TWIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated sharpening instruments, namely, abrading instruments, [ leather strops, ] knife sharpeners, [ sharpening stones, ] sharpening steels, sharpening rods; shears and scissors, namely, [ flower shears, gardner's shears, ] poultry shears, [ hair scissors, ] household shears, [ cuticle scissors, non-electric nail scissors, ] kitchen shears, [ tailor's shears, ] multi purpose shears; knives, namely, bread knives, slicing knives, vegetable knives, waiter's knives, Chefs knives, Santoku knives, peeling knives, cutting knives, mincing knives; [ non-electric can-openers; non-electric egg-cutters; ] flatware, forks and spoons; [ carving forks; non-electric vegetable peelers; cleavers; cheese planes; ] cutlery [ ; nut crackers, not of precious metal; non electric Pizza cutters; non-electric asparagus peelers; knife cases; non-electric finger nail polishers; non electric hair cutters; callus removers, namely, callus cutters and callus rasps; manicure sets; nail files; cuticle tweezers; nail clippers; non-electric nail care instruments; nail nippers; nail extractors; pedicure sets; tweezers; eye lash curlers ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | [ Pastry brushes; ] container for household and kitchen use not of precious metal; frying pans; [ cutting boards; ] [ brushes for body and beauty care, namely, make-up brushes and massage brushes; ] [ egg cups, not of precious metal; ice buckets; cruets, not of precious metal; chopsticks; bottle openers; stew-pans; garlic presses; ] [ cookery moulds; non electric cooking utensils, namely, non electric pressure cookers, lids for pots, cauldrons, cooking pots, ] [ works cork screws; knife rests fort he table; ] knife blocks; knife storage systems, namely, knife blocks and the like; [ hand operated mills for house hold use, namely, pepper, salt and spice mills; pasta spoons and pasta tongs for serving; turners, ] household utensils; [ shaving brushes; holders for shaving brushes; ] [ graters, household utensils; mixing spoons; spatulas, household utensils; scoops; skimming ladies; non electric whisk for household purposes; ] sieves and strainers for household purposes; [ pastry cutter, rolling pins; ] pots [ ; ] [ household gloves, oven cloth and oven gloves; ] [ pie servers; mincing knife boards ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TWIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |