Drawing for QDO

USPTO serial 79017148

QDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Ironmongery, namely torch holders and holders for hanging lanterns of common metal, key rings of common metal, money clips of common metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Cutlery, namely forks and spoons; barbecue stand sets with barbecue brushes, spades and tongs; salad tongs, cake spades, lasagne spades, carving sets consisting of small and large knivesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Oil lamps, heating plates and heating burners, namely saucettes and combination sets of trivets and tealightsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Racks, namely wine racks of metal, corks for bottles, corks for wine bottlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Household and kitchen utensils, namely containers not of precious metal or coated therewith; plates; trays, namely butler's trays, crumb trays, meal trays, serving trays not of precious metal; pots; pans, namely cake, pie and metal pans; sauce pots, dishes, hand operated salt and pepper grinders, salt and pepper sets; trivets; place card holder not of precious metal, candlesticks for tealights not of precious metal, candlesticks, napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal, wine pourers, foil cutters, decanting pourers, vacuum bottle stoppers not of precious metal; plates, namely cheese dish domes; bowls; coffee pots and coffee service not of precious metal, teapots and self-heating teapots with tealight sold as a unit, coffee beverage ware and coffee mugs, espresso cups, serving spoons, bottle openers, corkscrews, vases, wine coolers, beverage glassware and china, carving boardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 6, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance