USPTO serial 79017212
K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3194522Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell A. Tuchman
MITCHELL A TUCHMAN WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 13069RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles; parts of bicycles and accessories for bicycles, namely, frames for bicycles, rotor systems for bicycles, steering head sets for bicycles, forks for bicycles, projections for bicycles, handle bars for bicycles, brakes for bicycles, [ brake segments for bicycles, brake linings for bicycles, brake cables for bicycles, bells for bicycles, horns for bicycles, ] bicycle tires, [ tubeless tires for bicycles, ] inner tubes, casings for pneumatic tires, [ repair kits for inner tubes, consisting of rubber patches and liquid adhesive, patches for repairing inner tubes, pumps for bicycles, cycle mudguards, ] rims for bicycle wheels, hubs for bicycle wheels, spoke clips for bicycle wheels, pedals for bicycles, chains for bicycles, gears for bicycles, [ gear levers for bicycles, motors for bicycles, bicycle stands, stabilizers, rearview mirrors for bicycles, trailer hitches for bicycles, trailers for bicycles, goods handling carts for bicycles, seats for children for bicycles, hoods for bicycles, mechanical anti-theft devices for bicycles, luggage carriers for bicycles, luggage nets for bicycles, baskets adapted for bicycles, saddle bags for bicycles, bicycle bottle holders, ] bicycle saddles, [ saddle covers for bicycles ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wolfgang Göring and Thomas Göring
- Other trademarks owned by Wolfgang Göring and Thomas Göring
- Other trademarks owned by Wolfgang Göring and Thomas Göring
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named K
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |