USPTO serial 79017217
SECKLERMODULO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECKLERMODULO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pieterlen, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LEBOW
MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and modular handling systems comprised by frame, enclosure, palletizing axis, drawers, and/or control units for automating feeding, loading and unloading machines tools, and for the transferring of pallets, for use in a wide range of industrial and manufacturing applications in the automotive, hydraulics/pneumatics, medical, consumer and household goods and jewelry and watch industries, and for the manufacturing of high-precision components in various workplace environments; adaptable modules for use in machines and modular handling systems, namely gripper modules for use in handling, pallet conveyor modules, sequencer and discharge conveyor modules, pallet stacking box modules, inlet and outlet conveyors modules, bowl feeders modules, supply and discharge chute modules, flip over station modules, database connection modules, and modules for use in blowing, washing, cleaning, assembling, mounting, measuring, orienting, aligning, deburring, brushing and labeling for the aforementioned machines and modular handling systems; pallet stacking boxes for machines and modular handling systems; replacement parts and fittings for all of the aforementioned goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic control systems for machines; automatic measuring units for machines; integrated control cabinets in the nature of electronic and pneumatic control systems for machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |