Drawing for ASML PERFECTWAVE

USPTO serial 79017253

ASML PERFECTWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181179Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
BEYER, ELIZABETH L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASML PERFECTWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telescopes, binoculars, telescopic spectacles, binoculars for hunting purposes, telescopic sights for hunting purposes, opera-glasses, and telescopic glasses; spectacle frames, spectacle glasses, polarized spectacles, contact lenses, magnifying glasses, magnifying spectacles, and protective spectacles, including spectacles for protection against laser beams; aspheric and astronomical lenses; astrographs; astrographic lenses, photographic lenses, semi-conductor lenses, and microscope lenses; carriers and caps for optical lenses; prisms for lithography machines; crystal components and synthetic crystals for optical purposes, namely, crystal for use in lithographic machines; eyepieces; optical mirrors; surface roughness testing machines and instruments; optical reflectors; optical frequency metrology devices; and software for use in the field of metrology, namely, software for controlling lithographic machines and lithographic exposures and for measuring the surface of silic on wafersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Grinding, cutting, polishing and coating of glass and other optical surfacesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 1, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 19, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 11, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 8, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance