Drawing for OPENBC

USPTO serial 79017286

OPENBC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233565Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENBC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry J. Marenberg

KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software programs for use in data base management in the fields of business organization, business networking and establishing and arranging private and business contacts and information technology and instructional manuals sold as a unit; and computer hardwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Advertising; business networking, namely establishing and arranging private and business contacts; business organizational and professional business consultancy services in the field of support for the use, application and maintenance of computer software programs or technical solutions for information technology and data processing provided via the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Telecommunication services provided online or via the Internet, namely the electronic transmission, gathering, saving and delivery of messages, data, images and texts; providing access to telecommunications network in the nature of a business networking platformSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Information technology consultation in the field of creating, organizing, providing and allocating computer software programs; creation, installation and maintenance of computer software programs and data bases; technical consultancy provided via the Internet regarding the use, application and maintenance of computer software programs and technical support services, namely the troubleshooting of computer software problems; providing information in the field of information technology via the internetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 10, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance