Drawing for NEVADA

USPTO serial 79017291

NEVADA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194524Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEVADA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK LEBOW

MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Wainscotting not of metal; wood paneling; parquet flooring and wainscoting of wood or wood-based synthetic materials; parquet floor boards; furrings of wood; special moldings or profiles for construction and decoration, not of metal; sawn timber; wood veneers; palings, fences not of metal; glued-laminated wood for buildings; building materials for plant structures, namely, pergolas not of metal and latticework not of metal, pergolas, latticework not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 19, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance