Drawing for LEAN

USPTO serial 79017353

LEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MP3-players; CD-players; DVD-players; videotape recorders; DVD recorders; video cameras; radios; televisions, computer monitors; sound recording and reproduction machines, namely tape recorders; antennas; headphones; microphones; telephones; computers; printers; CDs; DVDsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance