Drawing for LEAN

USPTO serial 79017353

LEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MP3-players; CD-players; DVD-players; videotape recorders; DVD recorders; video cameras; radios; televisions, computer monitors; sound recording and reproduction machines, namely tape recorders; antennas; headphones; microphones; telephones; computers; printers; CDs; DVDsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance