Drawing for MEDIAANALYZER

USPTO serial 79017378

MEDIAANALYZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211577Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIAANALYZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

Lynn M. Humphreys MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BOULEVARDSUITE 400MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Market research consultation and market research servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Conducting of feasibility studies regarding usage, friendliness, acceptance, advertising efficiency, investigation of perception, investigation of user's behavior, [ development and implementation of software applications for media analysis in respect to advertising, Internet websites, videos, films, announcements, posters, packaging, user interfaces and computer games ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2014CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jul 10, 2014EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Jan 28, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jan 28, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 10, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 20, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 14, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Mar 9, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance