USPTO serial 79017387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $3,250
IT
CRIF BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES SPA (in forma breve CRIBIS SPA)
I-40131 BOLOGNA, IT
Other trademarks owned by CRIF BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES SPA (in forma breve CRIBIS SPA)
I-40131 BOLOGNA, IT
I-40131 BOLOGNA, IT
I-40131 BOLOGNA, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Tingey
David B. Tingey Kirton McConkie36 South State StreetSuite 1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for definition and management of credit system solutions; computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for credit policy and strategy in the credit decision processes; computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for rating system and credit scoring solutions; computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for credit risk management and credit risk assessment; computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for workflow management within the credit and insurance sectors; [ computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for the detection of insurance fraud; ] computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for the strategic management of credit and marketing; computer software for use in database management and for use as a spreadsheet for the strategic management of credit and marketing recorded on magnetic carriers; and computer software for providing an online database of small business tax statements | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Compilation of electronic databases, namely, compilation of databases featuring reports pertaining to financial, business profiles, credit cards, insurance topics and investment analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | [ Financial consultation services, namely, providing credit and financial solutions pertaining to credit cards, small- and medium-sized enterprise investments and retail businesses; ] financial information processing; financial research; [ investment consultation, namely, investment analysis; ] financial research pertaining to credit risk assessment; credit consultation, namely, credit reporting and providing decision support in the nature of consultation and advice and score models for evaluating the credit risk associated with granting credit to businesses; [ providing insurance information; ] credit rating services [ ; consultancy services in the field of control of debit and credit, namely, consumer credit consultation regarding investments, loan and financial guarantees and financing of loans ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | remote database access via a global computer network, namely, transmission of database information via the global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer software creation and development, namely, software authoring [ ; and rental of computer software ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |