Drawing for Serial No. 79017464

USPTO serial 79017464

Serial No. 79017464

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79017464?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eaux de toilette; deodorants for personal use (perfumery); essential oils; oils for cosmetic purposes; liquid soap; toiletries and beauty care milks; cosmetics; make-up and make-up removing products; cosmetic products and preparations for skin care, for weight loss, for the bath, for suntanning; beauty masks; hair lotions and hair care products; shampoos; shaving products, shaving soapsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 5, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
May 4, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Apr 27, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance