USPTO serial 79017544
IMUNAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMUNAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Johnson
RECHTSANWALT KLAUS PETER SCHMITZ-WECKAUFHUMBOLDTWEG 8-10DARMSTADT FED REP, 64297GERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations, namely, shampoos and hair conditioners; hair styling and finishing products, namely, hair sprays, spray gels, gels, mousses, creams, lotions, pomades and waxes, and hair scalp treatments, namely, restructurizers and scalp conditioners | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |