Drawing for FLEXCELL

USPTO serial 79017549

FLEXCELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXCELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, in particular transfer machines used for transforming work pieces; automatic assembly machines; robots; feeders and conveying devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Project studies for machining and assembling facilities; drawing up of plans for mechanical and automata construction; development of electric, electronic and pneumatic control devices for third parties; development of computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance