Drawing for X-LINE

USPTO serial 79017636

X-LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAN, REBECCAH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tool holder for fixed and driven tools, in particular multiple spindle noses, as well as angle drill, angle grinder and angle cutter heads and their components; tool retainers and their components, afore-mentioned goods as machine partsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance