USPTO serial 79017688
NABEGHLAVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NABEGHLAVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Natural mineral water | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 30, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |