USPTO serial 79017810
NORWOOD EYECARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORWOOD EYECARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Ophthalmic and optical formulations; namely, formulations for cleaning, wetting, cushioning and soaking lenses, saline solutions, ophthalmic vitamin and mineral supplements; ophthalmic pharmaceuticals namely anti-infectives, analgesics, topical antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anti-glaucoma and decongestant formulations, ocular wetting solutions, artificial tears and formulations for the treatment of ocular inflammation and allergic conditions; alcohol and viscoelastic preparations used in ophthalmic surgery; cell growth and storage solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Ophthalmic surgical instruments and devices used in performing ophthalmic surgical procedures and components thereof; disposable components of ophthalmic surgical instruments; aberrometers, tonometers; topographers; keratomes and blades; phacoemulsification devices; ophthalmic lasers; ophthalmic instruments for cutting, removing or ablating tissue; hand pieces for use in opthalmic surgical procedures; applanators; intraocular lens implants and devices for inserting them; corneal shields; separators for use in the physical separation of layers of cells or tissues; suction rings for use in ophthalmic procedures; medical tubing for use with ophthalmic surgical and medical apparatuses and instruments; drive control units for use with surgical and medical apparatus and instruments; foot pedals for use with surgical and medical apparatuses and instruments; drums for preserving a sheet of cells; and carrying cases adapted for surgical and medical apparatuses and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2008 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |