Drawing for MEGU

USPTO serial 79017822

MEGU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202362Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Nahnsen

MARK J. NAHNSEN BARNES & THORNBURG LLPP.O. BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services, hotel servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 29, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 29, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 29, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance