USPTO serial 79017891
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Pipe sleeves and sheets for sealing pipes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2025 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |