USPTO serial 79017924
BISSOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275338Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BISSOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA C. H. LIN
MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk and milk products, namely, butter, cheese, fresh cheese, chantilly cream, fresh cream, sour cream, condensed milk, yogurt, buttermilk, kefir, whey, milk powder; non-alcoholic milk drinks and mixed beverages with predominantly milk, namely, milk based drinks containing fruit, milk based drinks containing fruit juice, milk based drinks containing fruit flavors, milk based beverages containing coffee and chocolate milk; desserts primarily made with yogurt, desserts primarily made with cheese curds, desserts primarily made with cream, desserts primarily made with prepared fruits with the addition of aromatic herbs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Rice pudding; semolina mash in the nature of processed semolina; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added sour cream; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added buttermilk; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added curdled milk; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added yogurt; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added quark; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added kefir; muesli primarily consisting of breakfast cereals with added prepared fruits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral water and aerated water; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, aloe vera drinks, energy drinks, flavored waters, soft drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, soft drinks flavored with tea, Guarana drinks, isotonic drinks, sports drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BISSOU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |