USPTO serial 79017963
VISIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3885466Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
F-91570 BIEVRES, FR
Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
F-91570 BIEVRES, FR
Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
F-91570 BIEVRES, FR
Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H Holt
William H. Holt Law Offices of William H. Holt14584 West Dartmouth AvenueLakewood, CO 80228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programmable devices for processing signals, especially audio and video signals, namely, security digital video recorders with hard disc drive, professional broadcast encoders and decoders; development and prototype development systems, namely, apparatus comprising specific integrated circuits and software programmable components in the nature of microprocessors, microcontrollers, microsequencers, digital memory chips, printed circuit boards for the purpose of developing prototype devices and software in the field of video, audio and the Internet, excluding hardware and software for connecting users to the internet and web browsing software; audiovisual teaching apparatus in the field of security and video surveillance, namely, computers, monitors, cameras, microphones, telephones, projectors, headphones; amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers only, namely, internet protocol television decoders, portable multimedia players, digital video disc players; electric, electronic and computer data processing apparatus and instruments designed for the acquisition, processing and transmission of information, namely, encoders, decoders, transcoders, recorders, multiplexers, switches, routers, and Video-On-Demand servers, comprising hardware fixed function devices in the nature of application specific integrated circuit and software programmable components, namely, digital signal processors for the purpose of acquisition analogue to digital conversion, processing compression software and transmission by streaming over internet of information voice or music and/or images or video, and other analogue signals, namely, data generated by a radar; intercommunication apparatus consisting of full duplex two-way digital communication system for voice and/or video, namely, video phones; digital one-way transmitters of voice or music and/or images or video over Internet protocol; audio and video receivers; all of the aforementioned products are for use in the fields of security and video surveillance | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
- Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
- Other trademarks owned by ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE ET ETUDE DE MATERIELS ELECTRONIQUES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |