Drawing for ENR

USPTO serial 79018012

ENR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in industry, minerals (as chemical base materials)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
006Common metals and their alloys, oresSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
007Machines for mining operations, in particular for the extraction and processing of underground wealthSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Technical consulting in mining operations and the extraction and processing of underground wealthSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 14, 2008DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 30, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance