Drawing for RADLEY

USPTO serial 79018032

RADLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3803239Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2010
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE P FOXMAN

MICHELLE P FOXMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Articles of leather and imitation leather, namely, handbags; luggage; travel accessories, namely, cosmetic cases sold empty; jewelry rolls; attaché cases, bags, namely, handbags, traveling bags, bumbags, sports bags, leather envelopes for packaging and carrying and leather pouches, handbags, valises, hat boxes of leather and leather board, trunks, vanity cases sold empty,briefcases, wallets, purses, key cases, credit card cases, ticket folders in the nature of business card cases; umbrellas, parasols, small containers, namely, small backpacks, small rucksacks, small bags for men, small handbags; animal leashes and leads, lead, tail and harness straps for animals, fur, fur pelts and fur sold in bulkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, tops, shorts, skirts, socks, blouses, underwear, gloves, t-shirts, footwear, headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors, shoes, boots; scarves, shawls; ladies' apparel, namely, shirts, pants, tops, shorts; clothing beltsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 25, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 24, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 26, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 7, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance