USPTO serial 79018032
RADLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3803239Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE P FOXMAN
MICHELLE P FOXMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Articles of leather and imitation leather, namely, handbags; luggage; travel accessories, namely, cosmetic cases sold empty; jewelry rolls; attaché cases, bags, namely, handbags, traveling bags, bumbags, sports bags, leather envelopes for packaging and carrying and leather pouches, handbags, valises, hat boxes of leather and leather board, trunks, vanity cases sold empty,briefcases, wallets, purses, key cases, credit card cases, ticket folders in the nature of business card cases; umbrellas, parasols, small containers, namely, small backpacks, small rucksacks, small bags for men, small handbags; animal leashes and leads, lead, tail and harness straps for animals, fur, fur pelts and fur sold in bulk | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, tops, shorts, skirts, socks, blouses, underwear, gloves, t-shirts, footwear, headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors, shoes, boots; scarves, shawls; ladies' apparel, namely, shirts, pants, tops, shorts; clothing belts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Tula Group of Companies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Radley + Co. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Radley + Co. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Radley + Co. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RADLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |