USPTO serial 79018045
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DELLA GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DELLA GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MARSAN GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MARSAN GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by GIDASA SABANCI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
YILDIZ HOLDING ANONIM SIRKETI ETI
TR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony D Logan
Anthony D Logan Venjuris PC1938 E Osborn RdPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Beer; preparations used in the making of beers, namely, barley yeast, hops extracts, malt wort; ] mineral water, spring water, drinking water, soda pops, soda water [, soft drinks, namely, tonics; vegetable juices and fruit drinks, vegetable juice and fruit juice concentrates and non-alcoholic vegetable and fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks, namely, beverages in powder and granulated form extracted from fruits, grape must, turnip juice, tomato juice; colas, soda pops, isotonic drinks; vegetable juices, namely, boza (traditional Turkish drink), salep (traditional Turkish hot drink made from powdered roots of salep) ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |