Drawing for TINCUP

USPTO serial 79018051

TINCUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TINCUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Golf shoes, jackets clothing, sports shirts, polo shirts, tee-shirts, cardigans, vests, caps (head wear), leather belts clothing, socksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Golf bags with or without wheels, golf balls, golf gloves, golf clubs, caddie bags for golf clubs, apparatus for playing squash, skis, rackets, roller skates, rods for fishingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 9, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance