Drawing for PHAROS

USPTO serial 79018070

PHAROS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242611Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHAROS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer software; computer programs; computer hardware; computer equipment; magnetic disks and tape; optical storage disks, all for use in connection with process control for telecommunications systems, analogue and digital broadcasting systems, audio, visual and data systems, interactive broadcasting of video, audio and data systems, interactive graphical user systems, database scheduling, database media and asset management and database audio, video and data browsing systems, database storage and devices for video, audio and data, real time controllers, Internet control systems, touch screen control systems, hierarchical management systems and management information systems and artificial intelligence systems; computer object operating software programs relating to the broadcast and transmission of audio, video and dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Computer software and hardware consultancy, programming and design services; computer software creation, maintenance and support, updating and upgrading services; all services relating to the broadcast and transmission of audio, video and dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 15, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance