Drawing for HI-YIELD COTESI

USPTO serial 79018071

HI-YIELD COTESI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-YIELD COTESI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES T. J. WEIGELL

Charles T. J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Synthetic yarn baling twineABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 14, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 30, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 30, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Oct 13, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 20, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 22, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jan 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance