Drawing for ORTOMAT

USPTO serial 79018216

ORTOMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTOMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry S. Goldman,

B&P TAX & LEGAL AGTALSTRASSE 82, CH-8022 ZüRICHSWITZERLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring apparatus and instruments; radio receivers; devices, apparatus and instruments for recording or exploitation of noises and vibrations; data processing apparatus and computers; computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 2, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 29, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 22, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 9, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 19, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance